The United States Constitution


At the signing of the Treaty of Paris in September of 1783, the American Colonies found themselves without a king. It was an unlikely story: a bunch of ragtag volunteers–aided by the French–beat the world’s strongest army. Legend has it that the British Army band played a tune from the 1640s, entitled, “The World Turned Upside Down,” as the British Army surrendered to General George Washington at Yorktown. Truly, the world had turned upside down.

But now the colonies faced a new challenge: governing themselves. During the Revolutionary War, the colonies set up a loose form of government under the Articles of Confederation, which served to protect the sovereignty and independence of each state. The Articles were weak in a number of areas:

  1. While they gave Congress the power to assemble and pay for an Army, it gave no authority for a central government to compel the states to send troops or funding to the army.
  2. While Congress was responsible for the foreign policy of all 13 colonies, it was nearly impossible to implement because the Articles of Confederation gave Congress no power to enforce attendance at Congressional proceedings. They had difficulty raising a quorum of delegates to ratify foreign treaties, even the Treaty of Paris.
  3. Under the Articles, Congress’s powers of taxation were kept in check. Remember, they had just declared and fought for independence from a central government’s taxation. So the colonies purposefully left taxation and commerce clauses weak under the Articles. With no power to tax or regulate international or interstate trade, Congress was left to the will of the states for funding.

In essence, the Revolutionary War left the colonies independent but in disarray. As John Jay, the eventual 1st Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court stated, “that [under the Articles of Confederation] America had no sooner become independent than she became insolvent.”

To protect her infancy, several of our most notable Founding Fathers, including James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, John Jay and John Adams, called for a convention in Annapolis, Maryland, in 1786 to discuss revisions to the Articles of Confederation. The Annapolis Convention approved a follow-up convention in Philadelphia the next year starting in May with the original purpose of revising the Articles. But as momentum grew, the delegates held closed-door meetings in the sweltering-hot summer of 1787 to create a new Constitution. 

In creating the Constitution, the Founding Fathers set up a framework whereby this new sovereign country would govern itself. The debates lasted from mid-May 1787, through September 17, 1787, when it was signed and sent to the states for ratification.

The Constitution of the United States is divided into four sections, comprising a Preamble and its seven Articles.

  1. Articles I-III are known as the Separation of Powers section, whereby the federal government is laid out into three separate and distinct bodies with various authorities.
    1. Article I outlines the duties of a bi-cameral legislative branch. Called the Congress of the United States, the legislative branch is divided into the upper house, known as the Senate, and the lower house, known as the House of Representatives. Article one outlines the length of each term of service of the two houses (6 years for Senators and 2 years for Representatives). It also outlines how they are elected, what their governing responsibilities are and how old they must be to serve in each body.
    2. Article II outlines the duties of the executive branch, led by the President of the United States and other subordinate officers, such as the Vice President, and Secretaries of State, Treasury and War. (These have since been expanded to 15 Secretaries in the President’s Cabinet). Similar to Article I, it outlines how the president is elected (the Electoral College, which I will cover in another blog post), the length of a term and the age requirement for the President. It also states that the President, unlike the members of Congress, must be a person born in the United States. 
    3. Article III provides the framework around the judicial system, with the Supreme Court as the “highest court in the land.” This article talks about the idea of advice and consent, meaning the President provides names of judges in the federal court system, including the Supreme Court Justices, and those individuals are confirmed or denied by the Senate. This branch of government is not elected, but appointed to these positions. Within the Supreme Court, they serve for the duration of their lives, or until they retire.
  2. Articles IV-VI outline the concepts of federalism (which we will cover in greater detail in another blog post). 
    1. Article IV describes the states’ responsibilities in relation to the federal government, their relationship with one another, and gives the Federal Government the power to admit new states to the United States.
    2. Article V describes the process whereby the Constitution may be altered. It involves a two-step process to get an Amendment added to the Constitution: 1 – a Proposal for an Amendment may be proposed by a member of Congress, with two-thirds approval in each house of Congress, or it may be proposed by a convention of states called for by at least two-thirds of state legislatures; and 2 – a Ratification of at least three-fourths of the state legislatures. It has only happened 27 times in the nearly 235 year history of the United States, with one of the Amendments striking down another.
    3. Article VI establishes the laws and treaties of the United States made in accordance with the Constitution as the “Supreme Law of the Land,” forbids a religious test as a requirement for holding a governmental position, and holds the United States under the Constitution responsible for debts incurred by the United States under the Articles of Confederation.
  3. Article VII provides the process for ratification of the Constitution in the 13 states. It states that 9 of the 13 states needed to ratify it for it to become the law. The first state to ratify it, by a vote of 30-0, was Delaware on December 7, 1787. New Hampshire became the ninth state to ratify the Constitution on June 21, 1788, by a vote of 57-47. Its vote ensured the Constitution would be the law of the land. Rhode Island was the last of the 13 original states to ratify it on May 29, 1790, more than a year after George Wahington had taken the oath of office as the first President of the United States.
  4. I know this is out of order, but the Preamble is my personal favorite part of the Constitution. It is arguably the most famous part of the Constitution and contains one of the most famous phrases in all of American history: We the people…
    1. The Preamble outlines the purpose of setting up the Constitution and has two purposes. The first is to set up a “more perfect union” rather than the “perpetual union” under the Articles of Confederation. The second is to secure the blessings of liberty not only to themselves, but to their posterity. 
      1. I love the phrase, “a more perfect union,” included in the Preamble. It indicates to me that the Founding Fathers knew there were flaws in not only the current union and society that existed during their time, but also in the document they had just written and debated. But the word “more” indicates they knew it would never be perfect, but would be the ideal worth striving for always. 
    2. Securing the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity includes creating a framework whereby men and women of all races could be free. Again, they were keenly aware of the limitations of their own society. They knew it wasn’t perfect, but in setting up this framework, they hoped their posterity would be able to fix some of their inadequacies through establishing justice, ensuring domestic tranquility, providing for the defense of the country from foreign invasion, promoting the general welfare of the people, thereby securing liberty well into the future. 

In debating through the sweltering heat of the Philadelphia Summer of 1787, our Founding Fathers saw what could be. They had been through the inferno of the Revolution, the crucible of the loosely associated states, and saw the potential of what America could become. They were full of hope, and in reading the Constitution, it is filled with hope. 

The influence of the Constitution can be felt around the world. It was a groundbreaking document focused on the principles of the rule of law, separation of powers, and individual rights. It was one of the earliest to allow for amendment procedures and judicial review, and as most of the world at that time was ruled by a sovereign authority, it was the first to state outright that the government was for, of, and by the people, and has become the benchmark for republicanism around the world.

The Constitution of the United States is the oldest active codified constitution in the world. While the average “life expectancy” of a nation’s constitution is about 19 years, the U.S. Constitution has been an active document for more than 230 years.

The Mayflower Compact


Signing the Mayflower Compact 1620, a painting by Jean Leon Gerome Ferris 1899
In 1620, a group of 102 Pilgrims and 30 crew members boarded a 100-ft ship called Mayflower and sailed from England, by way of Holland, setting out for the New World. After a 10-week voyage, the ship landed at the tip of Cape Cod on the eastern coast of what would become Massachusetts. They landed on November 21, 1620, and named the place Plymouth Colony. 

The Pilgrims were separatists, meaning they separated themselves from the Church of England. They believed the Church of England was beyond repair, and so they sought liberty to practice their religion away from the reach of King James and his bishops in the Church in a “new Promised land.” However, they remained loyal to the King of England in their newly established settlement.

Before disembarking, 41 male passengers of the ship signed a compact, originally titled, Agreement Between the Settlers of New Plymouth. It has since become known as the Mayflower Compact.

It was a short document (less than 200 words) that brought the individual settlers together for a common purpose and established the order by which they would govern themselves.

There are four parts to the document:
– Pledging loyalty to King James of Great Britain, Ireland and France (this is the same King James who authorized the printing of the Holy Bible in English),
– Stating their purpose as to why they left their homeland (advancement of the Christian faith),
– Creating a civil Body Politick to further their stated goals, and
– Enacting a system of “just and equal Laws” for the good of the colony.

It established not the first set of laws for both Mayflower Pilgrims and non-Pilgrims, but a system by which they could enact laws. At the same time, it created the first government based on common consent in the New World, and established the American continent as a land of law and liberty for each colonist.

Essentially, the Mayflower Compact was the first experiment with democracy in the New World. 

In 1920, speaking at a dinner held by the Mayflower Descendents in Boston, Mass., to mark the 300th Anniversary of the Pilgrim’s landing at Plymouth, Massachusetts Governor Calvin Coolidge stated:
The compact which they signed was an event of the greatest importance. It was the foundation of liberty based on law and order, and that tradition has been steadily upheld. They drew up a form of government which has been designated as the first real constitution of modern times. It was democratic, an acknowledgment of liberty under law and order and the giving to each person the right to participate in the government, while they promised to be obedient to the laws.

The legacy of the Mayflower Compact is felt in our society today. It was the first time in modern history that a government was set up by the people and for the people. It leveraged the principle of common consent to help the Pilgrims to advance their society systematically, without monarchy or anarchy. As we have seen the spread of democracy throughout the world, this 200-word document is the cornerstone that all democracy has been built upon.

The Declaration of Independence


Editor’s Note: I was going to post the next few articles on the Mayflower Compact, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States, and the Bill of Rights in the order in which they occurred. However, with today being July 4, 2021, I decided it would be appropriate to post my writing on the Declaration of Independence to commemorate this significant date in the world’s history. I will next publish my post on the Mayflower Compact in the next few days. Happy Independence Day!!

The Seven Years War, or the French and Indian War (as we refer to it in the United States) was a war on multiple continents between the British and French. It started in the New World when young Col. George Washington of the British Virginia Militia led an ambush on the French troops at Jumonville Glen (near modern-day Pittsburg, PA), on May 28, 1754. The war became very pricey for the British Crown.

In an effort to pay for the War, between 1756 and 1773, British Parliament issued a series of taxes on the colonies, including the Stamp Act of 1765, the Townshend Duties of 1766, and the Tea Act of 1773. Although the taxes levied were relatively light, they were met with resistance based on the principle of “no taxation without representation.” Led by historical luminaries such as Samuel Adams (a local Boston Brewer), the Sons of Liberty organized rallies to reject the taxes being levied upon them. But nothing seemed to be working, and the colonists felt like second-class citizens of the King.

In mid-1776, after fighting between the Colonists and the British officially had broken out, each of the British American colonies sent delegates to the Second Continental Congress for the purpose of declaring independence from the British Empire. 

On June 11, 1776, the Continental Congress chose a committee of five men–John Adams of Massachusetts, Roger Sherman of Connecticut, Robert Livingston of New York, Benjamin Franklin of Pennsylvania, and Thomas Jefferson of Virginia–to draft and present to the full Congress a declaration of their independence. This Committee of Five, as it became known, selected Jefferson to pen the original draft. 

Known for his writing style and fluidity with words, Jefferson took the next 17 days to prepare a draft and submitted it to the rest of the select committee. With some revisions, the committee unanimously approved the Declaration before presenting it to the full Congress for its approval. On Wednesday, July 3, 1776, President John Hancock presided over the Congress who unanimously accepted the document then known as “A Declaration by the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress assembled.”

In the 1300-word+ letter to King George III, the Declaration itself can be broken out into seven parts:

  1. Introduction
  2. Preamble
  3. Indictment or grievances against the Crown
  4. Repeated and ignored warnings
  5. Denunciation
  6. Conclusion and statement of Independence
  7. Signatures

The Introduction to the Declaration states, “When in the course of human events…” it becomes necessary for one nation to dissolve its ties to another nation, the reasons for doing so should be enumerated. Basically, it’s announcing the breakup of the relationship with Great Britain… “Dear John (or George).”

The Preamble gives the reasons for revolution. It contains the most oft-quoted section of the Declaration of Independence. “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.” Jefferson then goes on to declare that governments are instituted among men to secure these rights. When those rights are endangered, it becomes the obligation of those harmed to get rid of the old form of government and start a new form of government which protects their safety and happiness. 

Also in the Preamble, Jefferson states that government should not be changed lightly, but while “suffering” is bearable, they should endure. “But when a long train of abuses and usurpations” continues beyond what is sufferable, “it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

The next section, the Indictment against the Crown, lists 27 different grievances the King has laid at the feet of the colonies. “The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.” Included in this list are:

  • Forbidding colonial governments to pass laws the colonies deemed necessary for safety and happiness
  • Dissolving legislatures for opposing with “manly firmness” invasions on the rights of the people
  • Refusing to let other legislatures be elected after dissolving them
  • Requiring judges to uphold the King’s will only
  • Quartering (housing) large armies in the colonies
  • Cutting off trade with other parts of the world
  • Imposing taxes on the colonies without their consent
  • Declaring the colonies at war with Britain
  • Constraining American sailors taken captive on the seas to fight against their brothers

This list is incomplete, but as you can see, there are a lot of heavy grievances the colonies had to deal with, which propelled them to revolt.

The section about Failed Warnings says, in summary, “We told you we were going to do this, time after time. We didn’t want to originally, because we are brothers who share a common heritage and language. But you failed to heed our warning. So here we are.”

The Denunciation finishes the case for independence and is very short. It states, “We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.” Basically, “Because you have failed to recognize our repeated warnings, we must go to war to fight for our right to self-government.”

Finally, in a closing paragraph unlike any written to that date in history, they declare their independence as representatives of the United Colonies.

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states.

They declare their right to wage war, make peace, establish commerce and enact laws commensurate with a free and independent state. Then the closing line of the document, in my view, is the most poetic and terrifying at the same time:

And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.

Fifty-six men, the signers of the Declaration of Independence, from each of the British American colonies had just performed an act of treason against the British Crown. They knew it, but were willing to pledge themselves to the cause of freedom from tyranny. The most famous of these signatures–because it was the largest–was John Hancock. He was the president of the Congress at that time and was responsible for attesting, or affirming to be true, the document voted on by Congress. In fact, his was the only signature on it for nearly six months as it was printed in broadsides around the country. Later, two future presidents of the United States (John Adams and Thomas Jefferson) would attach their signatures. 

The Declaration of Independence, even at the time, was revolutionary. It was the first of its kind to challenge the Divine Right of Kings, a doctrine that a monarch derives his or her power directly from God. By declaring that “all men are created equal,” the Founding Fathers were stating that no king or queen was better than anyone else. With the “unalienable rights” they claimed, they sought to re-establish equal rights with their peers in England. 

It wasn’t the first to be written, nor was it the first to declare cessation of ties to a king. But it was the first to declare that all men were created equal and had rights given to them from God. It was also the first to declare war on the former sovereign. Before 1776, there were two declarations of independence in the history of the world. Since 1776, there have been approximately 120 declarations of independence made by different countries and different peoples. Some countries have declared independence more than once, and several of the Confederate States individually declared independence from the United States using our Declaration of Independence as the model. 

What Thomas Jefferson and the Committee of Five presented to the Second Continental Congress on that hot July day in Philadelphia changed the world. It gave people the realization that they have the right to a free and independent government set up away from the usurpations of a tyrannical government. 

Founding Documents


In the United States, we often revere our Founding Fathers and the works they created. We refer to them as Founding Documents. 

Founding Documents are the initial documents that set up a system to operate within. They can also be called charters. The information provided in these documents typically include who’s involved, what the goals are, who has the authority and over what and whom, and if there is a life cycle to the group or project when it is complete.

In the project management world, charters are the documents that set up what the project is all about, what it’s intended goals and budgets are, who is involved including the project leader, and what the timeline of that project is expected to be. 

If we look at how businesses are established, there are core documents needed to start a business. For example, Articles of Incorporation in the United States is a document that “establishes the existence of a corporation.” Articles of organization are the equivalent for an LLC. These documents are filed with the State to establish the company’s existence. They outline the governance of the company, name of the organization, and the type of structure it will be–i.e., a for-profit corporation, nonprofit corporation, benefit corporation, or professional corporation. It also includes information about the registered agent, the number of authorized shares, the effective date, and the names and signatures of the incorporators.

Similarly, although not as detailed, is the document we call a marriage certificate or license. It outlines who the two individuals are that are part of the marriage, where the marriage took place, and who the witnesses and officiator at the marriage were. It often becomes the key piece of information for when a spouse wants to change a last name. 

Essentially, founding documents become evidence that something has been established and outlines what purpose that founding endeavors to follow.

In civics, founding documents create the state and the system of government that state will follow. They create the framework of what that government is able to do, who is responsible for which actions, and what rights individuals hold within that framework.

In the United States, we can easily point to four documents that are essential to the founding of our nation:

  • The Mayflower Compact
  • The Declaration of Independence
  • The Constitution
  • The Bill of Rights 

Others will argue that we should include the Federalist Papers, the Northwest Ordinance, or the Emancipation Proclamation in this categorization. However, there are different reasons I won’t include these in an essay on founding documents. The main reason is this: they are all subservient to the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Without those two documents, these others don’t serve the purpose they were created for, and may not have been written at all.

In the next few installments of these blog posts, I will answer what these documents are, why they were written, why they are significant to the world and why they are still needed today.

I am excited to learn and write out my thoughts on each of these documents, and I invite you to come along on this journey with me.

Proper Role of Government


What is the proper role of government? It’s a question we often hear people ask, especially in 2020. Not only do we have an election, but with a global pandemic affecting our every-day lives, we are seeing many in government trying to step up to battle the pandemic. In many minds, these efforts overstep their proper role; yet in other minds, it doesn’t go far enough.

I do not believe the government is the “be-all, end-all” in our lives. Far from it. When the government oversteps its bounds, it is the right–nay, responsibility–for the people to assert their rights.

From the previous discussion on natural rights, we determined, “the government’s role is not to instill or deplete…rights, but to maintain them for every individual.” In fact, you will recall that the government does not create these rights.

Thomas Jefferson wrote: “Can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are of the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?”

In further confirmation of Jefferson’s statement, former Secretary of Agriculture under President Dwight Eisenhower, and Apostle of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Ezra Taft Benson stated, “Governments were instituted of God for the benefit of man; and…he holds men accountable for their acts in relation to them, both in making laws and administering them, for the good and safety of society.”

Once we understand that we are granted specific rights, not by government, but by God, the next few questions to be answered are, “Why do we need a government?”, “What is the government supposed to do?”, and “What should the government not do?”

Why Do We Need a Government?

The French political economist, Frederick Bastiat, wrote, “Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” 

In other words, laws are instituted by government to ensure our life, liberty and property are free from tyranny. 

Swiss philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau further theorized that the state derives its powers from the consent of the governed. This is the main premise behind the Social Contract theory of government: The state exists because it ensures security, peace, economic development, and the resolution of conflict. It also means that individuals simultaneously give up some liberties for the function of the state. Outside of these functions, however, the state has no authority.

What Should the Government Do?

In his seminal work on government, English philosopher John Locke wrote, “The end of law is not to abolish or restrain, but to preserve and enlarge freedom. For in all the states of created beings, capable of laws, where there is no law there is no freedom. For liberty is to be free from restraint and violence from others, which cannot be where there is no law.”

Further, in his remarks on the Proper Role of Government, Benson continues, “It is generally agreed that the most important single function of government is to secure the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.”

Essentially, Benson, Locke, Bastiat, and Rousseau define government’s role solely as protecting the liberties of the people. In doing so, it creates law to ensure that liberty, life and property are available to all.

What should the government not do?

But governments can become too zealous in their desire and function to protect availability of these God-given rights. In doing so, they overstep their bounds by not only guaranteeing availability of these rights, but also forcing other “rights” upon the populace. (Refer back to my discussion on rights v. privileges for a deeper dive.)

In order to guarantee more “rights” upon the people, governments must often take from some to give to another. This enters the communist realm of government where ownership becomes the right of the whole. But as Benson properly points out, “[A government] cannot claim the power to redistribute the wealth or force reluctant citizens to perform acts of charity against their will.” 

To do so strips the populace of liberty and property; two rights that are not under the government’s authority to take.

Does that mean, however, that all taxes are theft? No. Taxes are the contract we enter into as a society to allow the government to do collectively that which we cannot do individually. We listed those above as ensuring security, peace, economic development and resolution of conflict among various parties. But we could also add building and maintaining roads and other infrastructure; building and maintaining public schools and providing quality education to our children; and providing utilities like water, power, gas and sewer systems to our homes and businesses. This is a gray area of government. On the far right, the libertarian argument is to keep the government out; while on the far left, the socialist argument is to let the government decide and provide these and many, many more “public goods.”

There is a balance, however. The interesting thought about conservatism is that it allows some investment in government assets (roads, schools, utilities, etc.) to the extent that it:

  1. Increases the ability of its peoples to exercise their fundamental rights, and
  2. Is not intended to guarantee success.

Conservatives demand that society allow for both success and failure as features of society. Thus, there is an automatic tension with regards to “equality” arguments. Conservatives  want people and businesses to succeed, but not because the government mandates that success. They want the market to be the driving force in that success. 

There’s also the human relations aspect that forms the fabric of society. We can’t rely on the government to do everything to keep our society functioning. We need each other as much as, if not much more than we need the government. We can step up to help each other in ways the government probably shouldn’t. For example, religious and other charitable organizations step in to help the needy in our society with food, clothing, life skills training, and sometimes shelter. We have a community around us to help in personal ways that the government can’t possibly understand. 

The government is necessary–some would call it a necessary evil. But in the United States, our government system is set up, more or less, to uphold our rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness because the people have required it to. It is, therefore, up to the people to ensure the government stays in its rightful place, and step up to help one another as we navigate our future as a society.

Rights v. Privileges


We often hear in the public discussion the concept of “rights” provided to people under supervision of the government. However, there is great confusion between rights and privileges in America today. Let’s start off by getting a better understanding of how rights and privileges are different.

Natural Rights

Natural rights are the inalienable rights granted to citizens by a higher power than the governing authority has to remove or improve upon. They are defined and limited; given only  by God, not by government. 

The idea of natural rights is found in the Social Contract theory of political and civil society. Originated by Thomas Hobbes in the Age of Enlightenment, the social contract outlines the legitimacy of the government over the individual. It stipulates that the people have given up some of their rights to “authority” in return for protection of their remaining rights.

John Locke famously built upon the social contract idea by outlining the rights the government needs to protect as including life, liberty and property. He clarified his statement on each of these as follows:

  • Everyone is entitled to live
  • Everyone is entitled to do anything they want to so long as it doesn’t conflict with the first right
  • Everyone is entitled to own all they create or gain through gift or trade so long as it doesn’t conflict with the first two rights.

Locke’s argument was that a government should be instituted to protect these rights for each of its citizens. Let me repeat that: Government is instituted to protect these rights for EACH of its citizens. That word “each” is significant. We’ll get to it later.

His thoughts were influential at the founding of the American movement. The colonials began to be aware of their rights being slowly–possibly methodically–taken away by the British Crown. In declaring independence from the tyranny of King George III, they specifically assert, with slight modification, the “truths” John Locke called out. 

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

It is of note that the “unalienable rights”–unalienable means “unable to be taken away from or given away by the possessor”–are endowed by their Creator. At that time in history, the King was seen as the representative of God on earth. For the Founding Fathers to include the language of being “endowed by their Creator” with these unalienable rights, they stated the authority they recognize went above the head of the King and directly to their Creator.

In citing these rights, the Founding Fathers were reasserting the social contract: that the government’s role is not to instill or deplete these rights, but to maintain them for every individual.

These rights are narrow in scope, but can allow individuals many freedoms not specifically named by these rights. It was intended to be that way, and still applies in our day.

Privileges

Let’s turn our focus to privileges for a brief moment. Going back to the root of the word, privilege means “private law.” In other words, it’s a” benefit, advantage, or a ‘right’” given to a limited portion of the population. By their very definition, privileges cannot be natural rights. As they are given to a limited portion of the population, they also cannot be given to “each of its citizens.”

Whereas rights cannot be removed or revoked by a governing authority because they are endowed to each of us by God, privileges are conditional. Revoking privileges, therefore, is always on the table by various government decisions.

So…why does it matter:

We hear so many politicians and others, especially more liberal leaning individuals, talk about a variety of privileges, claiming they are human rights. Among these privileges, universal health care, free college tuition, and universal minimum wage are declared as “rights” that all Americans–citizens or not–deserve. This cannot be the case.

While I appreciate that people want, and need, these things, the simple fact is wanting something (even really badly) does not make it a right that you receive.

We are not “endowed by our Creator” with access to health care, paid college tuition and a guaranteed wage. Those things cost money. They may be granted by the government, to be sure, but because they must be funded by some portion of the population, these items cannot be considered “rights.” Instead, these items are, indeed, privileges.

Having stated this difference, I firmly believe in the commandment to “love your neighbor.” While we all have rights, only some have privileges. And sometimes, people are “punished” for no reason of their own. Whatever the reason, some people just don’t have the opportunities presented to them that others get. 

Yet, we don’t have to rely on the government to provide privileges to each person; however, can we not be a little more charitable toward one another, cheer each other on, and increase the number of privileges people have opportunities for? 

Doing so would actually increase our rights, by supporting each other in our own pursuit of happiness. No one can take that away from us.

My Promise To You


I want to offer representation, accessibility, and information to those I serve.

REPRESENTATION
I will truly represent my constituents. I have talked with people across our district who do not feel like they have a voice on Capitol Hill. Elected officials can be out of touch with how legislation affects our lives.

I am fundamentally opposed to doing this alone. We all share conservative values. I will need the help, perspective, and knowledge of those in our area. I am not an expert in all fields of
legislation. I want to establish a Community Advisory Board, with voices from diverse sections of our District. Community and business leaders, educators, parents, and students all offer valuable insight as I make decisions to help our government be more efficient.

ACCESSIBILITY
I want to encourage citizens to reach out to me. I will set aside the time to reply and listen. Communicating well and understanding your concerns is a priority. I am committed to treating everyone with respect, even those who may not agree with me.

INFORMATION
I want to help inform my constituents. Politics is too often based on emotion or only a partial understanding of the facts. As I learn and study, I want to share my knowledge. As we all learn
and participate in the process, we become a stronger community.

Environment


With increased economic development and growth all over the state, we have to be mindful of our air quality.

Much is being done to reduce the trapped pollutants during inversions. In some instances, legislation may be necessary. In other cases, we need to encourage the technology that will allow for cleaner air quality. We must continue down the path of innovative solutions to our air quality issues.

Family and Education


I am grateful to be raising my family here in Pleasant Grove, Utah. We have strong family values that are critical to a healthy society. I understand the issues facing families in today’s uncertain world. With the rise of technology and mental health issues, we need to be supportive of what families need to stay strong and raise healthy, productive children.

Education funding needs to become a priority, especially with the population growing so rapidly. I know parents need to have control and choices when it comes to their children’s education. I also believe we need to support our public school system where the majority of kids attend school. Legislating education bills and mandates without providing the means of funding hurts our schools and our children. We need to truly understand how legislation affects the classroom. Our teachers, in all sectors of education, need our support.

Our children are the future of Utah and our Country. We need to discuss all options to improve the quality of education our children receive.

Economic Development


As a professional in the field of technology and management, I love seeing the entrepreneurship and growth we are experiencing here in Utah. With that growth also comes challenges and the need to be prepared for the future.

The rise of Silicon Slopes shows us how successful the Utah economy has become over the last decade. But how do we work to continue that growth and prepare our economy for possible future instabilities?

I want to increase diverse economic development across Utah. We need to continue to make Utah a desirable location for companies considering relocation or the opening of new offices. The growth, both inside and outside of Silicon Slopes, gives our communities much needed tax dollars and resources to meet their unique needs.

We need good fiscal management now while the economy is booming to be prepared in the event of a downturn. This also encourages resilience and quicker recovery from a recession.